Coded clean. On time.
How it works
Reads the documentation
Works through the charts, reads the full note, and understands the diagnoses, procedures, and visit complexity that's actually documented.
Assigns the codes
Assigns the ICD-10, CPT, and E/M codes the documentation supports, catches missed HCCs and under-coding, and ties every code back to the chart.
Routes the edge cases
Finalizes the charts it's confident in and routes the ambiguous ones - unspecified diagnoses, complex E/M, missing documentation - to a coder to review.
From chart to coded claim, end to end
It reads the chart, assigns the diagnosis, procedure, and visit-level codes the documentation supports, checks the audit trail, and finalizes the ones it's confident in - routing anything ambiguous to a coder.
Works in the tools you already use
Frequently asked
Both, by your rules. It codes the high-confidence charts autonomously, with every code tied to the documentation and a full audit trail, and routes the ambiguous ones - unspecified diagnoses, complex E/M, thin documentation - to a coder. You set the confidence bar for what it finalizes versus flags.
It reads the whole note, so it catches missed HCCs, under-specified diagnoses, and under-coded visits that hand-coding under volume misses - and it won't code beyond what's documented, so it doesn't create compliance risk.
No. Every code is grounded in and linked to the documentation, with a reviewable trail, and anything the chart doesn't support is flagged rather than coded - so audits and compliance reviews have a complete record.
Your EHR and coding tools - Epic, athenahealth, Oracle Health, Waystar - reading the chart and writing the codes the way a coder would, scoped to your compliance requirements.
Your first AI employee
is one call away
Caesar will call you right now, introduce himself, and show you exactly how this works.