On the desk. Already triaged.
How it works
Reads the submission
Takes the broker submission in any format - ACORD, email, PDF, spreadsheets, loss runs - and reads it the way an intake analyst would.
Extracts & enriches
Pulls every field into structured data, enriches it with third-party property, business, and prior-claims sources, and checks sanctions.
Triages to the underwriter
Runs the appetite check, flags coverage gaps and missing info, and writes a clean, triaged risk file into the workbench - the underwriter decides.
From broker submission to a structured risk file
It reads the submission in whatever the broker sent, extracts the fields, enriches them with third-party and prior-claims data, runs the appetite check, and writes a clean, triaged file into the underwriting workbench.
Works in the tools you already use
Guidewire
Duck Creek
Applied Epic
Verisk
Salesforce
SlackFrequently asked
The messy reality of the broker inbox: ACORD forms, emails, PDFs, spreadsheets, and loss runs. It reads them the way an intake analyst would, extracts the fields, and structures them - so underwriters stop spending 30-40 minutes keying each submission before any risk work begins.
No. It does the intake and prep - extracting, enriching, checking appetite, and flagging gaps - and hands a clean, triaged file to the underwriter, who makes the risk and pricing decision. It prepares; the underwriter decides.
Third-party property and business data, prior-claims and loss history, and sanctions and watchlist checks - so the underwriter opens a file that's already enriched, not a bare submission they have to research.
Your underwriting and policy systems - Guidewire, Duck Creek, Applied Epic - plus your data sources, writing the structured submission straight into the workbench, so there's no custom integration to start.
Your first AI employee
is one call away
Caesar will call you right now, introduce himself, and show you exactly how this works.